4.6 Article

Lipophilicity Study of Fumaric and Maleic Acids

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11040993

Keywords

n-octanol-water partition coefficient; NP-TLC; RP-TLC; lipophilicity parameter R-MW; fumaric acid; maleic acid; topological index; densitometry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lipophilicity of fumaric acid and maleic acid was determined using the shake-flask method and reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography. The experimental partition coefficients showed that maleic acid is less lipophilic than fumaric acid. Reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography was also used to evaluate the chromatographic lipophilicity of the two acids.
The experimental lipophilicity of fumaric acid (FA) and maleic acid (MA) using the traditional shake-flask method in an n-octanol-water system using reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography (RP-TLC) was determined. Experimental partition coefficients (logP(exp)) were equal to -0.65 and 0.63 for MA and FA, respectively. The chromatographic lipophilicity (R-MW) of the FA and MA was evaluated using reversed-phase thin-layer chromatography on RP8F(254s), RP18WF(254), and CNF254s plates with a mixture of an organic solvent (methanol or dioxane) and water as the mobile phase. All applied chromatographic conditions were appropriate to determine the lipophilicity of the tested MA and FA. Topological indices derived from distance matrices allowed for the development of a new method for the evaluation of the lipophilicity of MA and FA. All methods applied in this work indicate that MA is less lipophilic than FA. The methods used in this work to determine lipophilicity are of particular importance in the aspect of studying cis- and trans-configuration compounds, because generally available computer programs based on various algorithms (Virtual Computational Chemistry Laboratory and Molinspiration Cheminformatics) indicate that fumaric acid and maleic acid have identical logP values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available