4.6 Article

Signal-to-Image: Rolling Bearing Fault Diagnosis Using ResNet Family Deep-Learning Models

Journal

PROCESSES
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pr11051527

Keywords

rolling bearing; fault diagnosis; deep learning; continuous wavelet transform

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rolling element bearings (REBs) are the most common cause of machine breakdowns. Traditional fault diagnosis methods rely on feature extraction and signal processing, which can be affected by the complexity of patterns and the need for expert knowledge. This paper proposes a novel signal-to-image method using continuous wavelet transform (CWT), which enhances feature extraction and eliminates the need for manual extraction.
Rolling element bearings (REBs) are the most frequent cause of machine breakdowns. Traditional methods for fault diagnosis in rolling bearings rely on feature extraction and signal processing techniques. However, these methods can be affected by the complexity of the underlying patterns and the need for expert knowledge during signal analysis. This paper proposes a novel signal-to-image method in which the raw signal data are transformed into 2D images using continuous wavelet transform (CWT). This transformation enhances the features extracted from the raw data, allowing for further analysis and interpretation. Transformed images of both normal and faulty rolling bearings from the Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) dataset were used with deep-learning models from the ResNet family. They can automatically learn and identify patterns in raw vibration signals after continuous wavelet transform is used, eliminating the need for manual feature extraction. To further improve the training results, squeeze-and-excitation networks (SENets) were added to improve the process. By comparing results obtained from several models, we found that SE-ResNet152 has the best performance for REB fault diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available