4.4 Article

Relationship between multi-slice computed tomography features and pathological risk stratification assessment in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Journal

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 1073-1085

Publisher

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i6.1073

Keywords

Computed tomography; Gastrointestinal stromal tumor; Risk stratification; Stomach

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study analyzed the clinicopathological and CT imaging data of 147 patients with primary gastric GISTs and found that tumor size, growth patterns, and lesion contours were predictive CT features for malignant potential.
BACKGROUND Computed tomography (CT) imaging features are associated with risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). AIM To determine the multi-slice CT imaging features for predicting risk stratification in patients with primary gastric GISTs. METHODS The clinicopathological and CT imaging data for 147 patients with histologically confirmed primary gastric GISTs were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had received dynamic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) followed by surgical resection. According to the modified National Institutes of Health criteria, 147 lesions were classified into the low malignant potential group (very low and low risk; 101 lesions) and high malignant potential group (medium and high-risk; 46 lesions). The association between malignant potential and CT characteristic features (including tumor location, size, growth pattern, contour, ulceration, cystic degeneration or necrosis, calcification within the tumor, lymphadenopathy, enhancement patterns, unenhanced CT and CECT attenuation value, and enhancement degree) was analyzed using univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of high malignant potential. The receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the predictive value of tumor size and the multinomial logistic regression model for risk classification. RESULTS There were 46 patients with high malignant potential and 101 with low-malignant potential gastric GISTs. Univariate analysis showed no significant differences in age, gender, tumor location, calcification, unenhanced CT and CECT attenuation values, and enhancement degree between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, a significant difference was observed in tumor size (3.14 +/- 0.94 vs 6.63 +/- 3.26 cm, P < 0.001) between the low-grade and high- grade groups. The univariate analysis further revealed that CT imaging features, including tumor contours, lesion growth patterns, ulceration, cystic degeneration or necrosis, lymphadenopathy, and contrast enhancement patterns, were associated with risk stratification (P < 0.05). According to binary logistic regression analysis, tumor size [P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR) = 26.448; 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.854-144.099)], contours ( P = 0.028; OR = 7.750; 95% CI: 1.253- 47.955), and mixed growth pattern (P = 0.046; OR = 4.740; 95%CI: 1.029-21.828) were independent predictors for risk stratification of gastric GISTs. ROC curve analysis for the multinomial logistic regression model and tumor size to differentiate high-malignant potential from low-malignant potential GISTs achieved a maximum area under the curve of 0.919 (95%CI: 0.863-0.975) and 0.940 (95%CI: 0.893-0.986), respectively. The tumor size cutoff value between the low and high malignant potential groups was 4.05 cm, and the sensitivity and specificity were 93.5% and 84.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION CT features, including tumor size, growth patterns, and lesion contours, were predictors of malignant potential for primary gastric GISTs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available