4.7 Article

Emetic Tartar-Loaded Liposomes as a New Strategy for Leishmaniasis Treatment

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030904

Keywords

liposomes; emetic tartar; visceral leishmaniasis; acute toxicity; antileishmanial efficacy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Liposomes containing emetic tartar (ET) were prepared and evaluated for the treatment of leishmaniasis. The encapsulation of ET in liposomes reduced its side effects and showed antileishmanial activity in a mouse model.
Emetic tartar (ET), was used in the treatment of leishmaniasis but its use was discontinued due to its low therapeutic index. Liposomes have been shown to be a promising strategy for delivery of bioactive substances in the region of interest, in order to reduce and/or eliminate undesirable effects. In the present study, liposomes containing ET were prepared and characterized to evaluate acute toxicity as well as their leishmanicidal action using BALB/c mice with an inoculum of Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum. Liposomes were composed of egg phosphatidylcholine and 3ss-[N-(N ',N '-dimethylaminoethane)-carbamoyl]cholesterol, with an average diameter of 200 nm, zeta potential of +18 mV, and ET encapsulated into liposomes at a concentration near 2 g/L. Healthy mice were treated with ET or liposome containing ET (Lip-ET) in a single dose of 16 mg/kg of Sb3+ intravenously and observed for 14 days. The death of two animals in the ET-treated group and no deaths in the Lip-ET-treated group was observed. Higher hepatic and cardiac toxicity were observed in animals treated with ET when compared to animals treated with Lip-ET, blank liposomes (Blank-Lip) and PBS. The study of antileishmanial efficacy was conducted by intraperitoneal administration of Lip-ET, for ten consecutive days. It was observed by limiting dilution that treatments with liposomal formulations containing ET, as well as Glucantime((R)), led to a significant reduction in parasitic load in spleen and liver (p < 0.05) when compared to the untreated control group.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available