4.7 Review

Application of Computing as a High-Practicability and -Efficiency Auxiliary Tool in Nanodrugs Discovery

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041064

Keywords

nanodrug; drug research and development; computing; model prediction; molecular simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computing has played an important role in nanodrug R&D, providing substantive solutions and making significant contributions to data-driven decision-making, reducing failure rates, and saving time costs. However, there are still issues that need to be explored and summarized to promote the high-practicability and -efficiency of computing in nanodrug discovery and development.
Research and development (R&D) of nanodrugs is a long, complex and uncertain process. Since the 1960s, computing has been used as an auxiliary tool in the field of drug discovery. Many cases have proven the practicability and efficiency of computing in drug discovery. Over the past decade, computing, especially model prediction and molecular simulation, has been gradually applied to nanodrug R&D, providing substantive solutions to many problems. Computing has made important contributions to promoting data-driven decision-making and reducing failure rates and time costs in discovery and development of nanodrugs. However, there are still a few articles to examine, and it is necessary to summarize the development of the research direction. In the review, we summarize application of computing in various stages of nanodrug R&D, including physicochemical properties and biological activities prediction, pharmacokinetics analysis, toxicological assessment and other related applications. Moreover, current challenges and future perspectives of the computing methods are also discussed, with a view to help computing become a high-practicability and -efficiency auxiliary tool in nanodrugs discovery and development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available