4.7 Article

A Multi-Criteria Decision Aid Tool for Radiopharmaceutical Selection in Tau PET Imaging

Journal

PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041304

Keywords

positron emission tomography; radiopharmaceuticals; tauopathies; Alzheimer's disease; decision analysis; fuzzy PROMETHEE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging with tau-specific radiotracers allows for the detection and quantification of tau pathology in living subjects, which aids in the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and monitoring disease progression and treatment effectiveness. This study analyzed, compared, and ranked currently available tau PET radiotracers using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tool called PROMETHEE. Based on weighted criteria such as specificity, target binding affinity, brain uptake, brain penetration, and rates of adverse reactions, the second-generation tau tracer [F-18]RO-948 was found to be the most favorable. This flexible method can be expanded and updated to assist researchers and clinicians in choosing the optimal tau PET tracer for specific purposes.
The accumulation of pathologically misfolded tau is a feature shared by a group of neurodegenerative disorders collectively referred to as tauopathies. Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most prevalent of these tauopathies. Immunohistochemical evaluation allows neuropathologists to visualize paired-helical filaments (PHFs)-tau pathological lesions, but this is possible only after death and only shows tau in the portion of brain sampled. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging allows both the quantitative and qualitative analysis of pathology over the whole brain of a living subject. The ability to detect and quantify tau pathology in vivo using PET can aid in the early diagnosis of AD, provide a way to monitor disease progression, and determine the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing tau pathology. Several tau-specific PET radiotracers are now available for research purposes, and one is approved for clinical use. This study aims to analyze, compare, and rank currently available tau PET radiotracers using the fuzzy preference ranking organization method for enrichment of evaluations (PROMETHEE), which is a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tool. The evaluation is based on relatively weighted criteria, such as specificity, target binding affinity, brain uptake, brain penetration, and rates of adverse reactions. Based on the selected criteria and assigned weights, this study shows that a second-generation tau tracer, [F-18]RO-948, may be the most favorable. This flexible method can be extended and updated to include new tracers, additional criteria, and modified weights to help researchers and clinicians select the optimal tau PET tracer for specific purposes. Additional work is needed to confirm these results, including a systematic approach to defining and weighting criteria and clinical validation of tracers in different diseases and patient populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available