Journal
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1139189
Keywords
diffusion weight imaging; diffusion kurtosis imaging; intravoxel incoherent motion; breast cancer; prognosis; molecular subtypes
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study investigated the correlations between quantitative diffusion parameters and prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer using a single fast high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with mono-exponential, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) models. The results showed significant differences in the DWI-derived parameters between different subtypes and prognostic factors of breast cancer. Additionally, the morphologic characteristics obtained from high-resolution DWI were found to be able to identify the estrogen receptor status of breast cancer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlations between quantitative diffusion parameters and prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast cancer, based on a single fast high-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequence with mono-exponential (Mono), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) models. Materials and MethodsA total of 143 patients with histopathologically verified breast cancer were included in this retrospective study. The multi-model DWI-derived parameters were quantitatively measured, including Mono-ADC, IVIM-D, IVIM-D*, IVIM-f, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp. In addition, the morphologic characteristics of the lesions (shape, margin, and internal signal characteristics) were visually assessed on DWI images. Next, Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman's rank correlation, logistic regression, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and Chi-squared test were utilized for statistical evaluations. ResultsThe histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, IVIM-D, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were significantly different between estrogen receptor (ER)-positive vs. ER-negative groups, progesterone receptor (PR)-positive vs. PR-negative groups, Luminal vs. non-Luminal subtypes, and human epidermal receptor factor-2 (HER2)-positive vs. non-HER2-positive subtypes. The histogram metrics of Mono-ADC, DKI-Dapp, and DKI-Kapp were also significantly different between triple-negative (TN) vs. non-TN subtypes. The ROC analysis revealed that the area under the curve considerably improved when the three diffusion models were combined compared with every single model, except for distinguishing lymph node metastasis (LNM) status. For the morphologic characteristics of the tumor, the margin showed substantial differences between ER-positive and ER-negative groups. ConclusionsQuantitative multi-model analysis of DWI showed improved diagnostic performance for determining the prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of breast lesions. The morphologic characteristics obtained from high-resolution DWI can be identifying ER statuses of breast cancer.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available