4.7 Article

Upcycling Chips-Bags for Passive Daytime Cooling

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGIES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/admt.202300444

Keywords

optical spectroscopy; photonic materials; polymer recycling; radiative cooling; sun shelters

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plastic pollution has caused environmental issues and recycling challenges. This study proposes a new strategy to reuse aluminum-plastic laminates (APL) for passive daytime cooling applications. By coating the reflective layer of APL waste and applying a high emissive polydimethylsiloxane layer, a promising and flexible passive cooling foil is constructed. The low-cost APL waste-based passive cooling foil will contribute to energy and environmental issues.
Plastic pollution has caused numerous environmental issues in recent decades. As one of the most commonly used packaging materials, aluminum-plastic laminates (APL) are particularly challenging for recycling purposes due to their sophisticated materials components. This work reveals a new strategy to upcycle such post-consumer APL packaging waste, e.g., chips-bags, for passive daytime cooling applications. This opens an attractive route to reuse APLs while at the same time reducing global energy consumption and carbon emissions. The mirror-like appearance of the APLs possesses a strong solar reflection, up to 86%. By coating, this reflective layer of the APL waste with a high emissive polydimethylsiloxane layer, a simple but effective passive daytime cooling foil is constructed, which shows promising passive cooling performance theoretically and practically. More importantly, the passive cooling foil based on APL waste is flexible and can be applied to any target object, protecting it from harsh sunlight. The low-cost APL waste-based passive cooling foil proposed in this work will significantly contribute to both energy and environmental issues that humans face today.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available