4.6 Article

Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection for Frost Tolerance in a Diallel Population of Potato

Journal

CELLS
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cells12091226

Keywords

frost tolerance; potato; diallel population; BSA; MAS

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized a multi-parental population to perform genetic mapping and molecular marker development for frost tolerance in potatoes. Three candidate regions and six SNP markers associated with frost tolerance were identified. A molecular marker-assisted selection system was established, which provides practical advantages for expanding and improving frost-tolerant germplasm resources in potatoes.
A multi-parental population is an innovative tool for mapping large numbers of loci and genetic modifications, particularly where they have been used for breeding and pre-breeding in crops. Frost injury is an environmental stress factor that greatly affects the growth, development, production efficiency, and geographical distribution of crops. No reported study has focused on genetic mapping and molecular marker development using diallel populations of potatoes. In this study, 23 successful cross combinations, obtained by a half diallel cross among 16 parents, including eight frost-tolerant advanced breeding lines and eight cultivars, were used to map the genetic loci for frost tolerance and to create a molecular marker-assisted selection (MAS) system. Three candidate regions related to frost tolerance on chromosomes II, V, and IX were mapped by bulked segregant analysis (BSA). Furthermore, six SNP markers associated with frost tolerance from candidate regions were developed and validated. Above all, a MAS system for the frost tolerance screening of early breeding offspring was established. This study highlights the practical advantages of applying diallel populations to broaden and improve frost-tolerant germplasm resources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available