4.6 Article

Skin Toxicity as a Predictor of Survival in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients Treated with Anti-EGFR: Fact or Fallacy?

Journal

CANCERS
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061663

Keywords

metastatic CRC; mCRC; skin toxicity; survival; anti-EGFR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The primary treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) includes targeted therapy and chemotherapy. Anti-EGFR antagonists can cause skin reactions in 50-70% of patients. Severe skin reactions may be linked to overall survival and progression-free survival, but the results are uncertain. A retrospective analysis of mCRC patients undergoing anti-EGFR therapy showed that the first-line treatment significantly affected overall survival and progression-free survival. There was a gender difference in the incidence of acne caused by anti-EGFR antagonists.
The primary treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) consists of targeted therapy and chemotherapy to improve survival. A molecular target drug with an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antagonist is recommended when the RAS and BRAF genes are normal. About 50-70% of patients using anti-EGFR antagonists will experience skin reactions. Some studies have shown that severe skin reactions caused by anti-EGFR antagonists may be linked to overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), but the results are still uncertain. These data of mCRC patients who underwent anti-EGFR therapy between October 2017 and October 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 111 patients were included in this study. The survival results showed that gender, age, body mass index, primary tumor site, and recurrence did not significantly affect OS and PFS. However, the first-line anti-EGFR inhibitor treatment was significantly associated with OS (p < 0.001) and PFS (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acne between males and females in grades 1 and 2, while males have a greater risk in grades 3 and 4 than females (20.3 vs. 4.8%; p-value = 0.041). Skin toxicity was not a predictor of anti-EGFR treatment response in this investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available