Preoperative Mutational Analysis of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) and Plasma-cfDNA Provides Complementary Information for Early Prediction of Relapse: A Pilot Study in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Simple Summary Limited studies have focused specifically on early-stage NSCLC patients, although there is a particular clinical need for risk stratification in these patients because there are very few therapeutic options in the adjuvant setting. In this prospective study, we compared ddPCR data of hotspot mutations for four therapeutically relevant genes (BRAF, EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA) from three different patient-matched sample types (FFPE, CTC-derived DNA and plasma-ctDNA) from early-stage NSCLC patients before surgery. We demonstrated that simultaneous analyses of plasma-cfDNA and CTC-derived DNA provided complementary molecular information from the same blood sample and greater diversity in genomic information for cancer treatment and prognosis. Purpose: We assessed whether preoperativemutational analyses of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and plasma-cfDNA could be used as minimally invasive biomarkers and as complimentary tools for early prediction of relapse in early-stage non-small -cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Experimental Design: Using ddPCR assays, hotspot mutations of BRAF, KRAS, EGFR and PIK3CA were identified in plasma-cfDNA samples and size-based enriched CTCs isolated from the same blood samples of 49 early-stage NSCLC patients before surgery and in a control group of healthy blood donors (n= 22). Direct concordance of the mutational spectrum was further evaluated in 27 patient-matched plasma-cfDNA and CTC-derived DNA in comparison to tissue-derived DNA. Results: The prevalence of detectable mutations of the four tested genes was higher in CTC-derived DNA than in the corresponding plasma-cfDNA (38.8% and 24.5%, respectively).The most commonly mutated gene was PIK3CA, in both CTCs and plasma-cfDNA at baseline and at the time of relapse. Direct comparison of the mutation status of selected drug-responsive genes in CTC-derived DNA, corresponding plasma-cfDNA and paired primary FFPE tissues clearly showed the impact of heterogeneity both within a sample type, as well as between different sample components. The incidence of relapse was higher when at least one mutation was detected in CTC-derived DNA or plasma-cfDNA compared with patients in whom no mutation was detected (p =0.023). Univariate analysis showed a significantly higher risk of progression (HR: 2.716; 95% CI, 1.030-7.165; p =0.043) in patients with detectable mutations in plasma-cfDNA compared with patients with undetectable mutations, whereas the hazard ratio was higher when at least one mutation was detected in CTC-derived DNA or plasma-cfDNA (HR: 3.375; 95% CI, 1.098-10.375; p =0.034). Conclusions: Simultaneous mutational analyses of plasma-cfDNA and CTC-derived DNA provided complementary molecular information from the same blood sample and greater diversity in genomic information for cancer treatment and prognosis. The detection of specific mutations in ctDNA and CTCs in patients with early-stage NSCLC before surgery was independently associated with disease recurrence, which represents an important stratification factor for future trials.

Automated summary

By comparing blood samples from early-stage NSCLC patients, it was found that simultaneous analysis of plasma-cfDNA and CTC-derived DNA can provide complementary molecular information and greater genomic diversity for cancer treatment and prognosis.