Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072514
Keywords
Tourette syndrome; therapy; tic disorders; transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation; randomized controlled trial; crossover studies
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A prior study found that rhythmic 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS), but the cortical entrainment hypothesis could not explain this benefit. A replication study with 32 TS patients showed that both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz median nerve stimulation improved tic symptoms, but the two treatments did not differ significantly. The study suggests that another electrophysiological mechanism, or a placebo effect, may explain the improvement.
A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained the sensorimotor cortex EEG signal and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested, and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 min. We set out to replicate the TS results and to test whether tic improvement occurs by the proposed cortical entrainment mechanism. Preregistration was completed at ClinicalTrials.gov, under number NCT04731714. Thirty-two people with TS, age 15-64, completed two study visits with repeated MNS on and off blocks in random order, one visit for rhythmic and one for arrhythmic MNS. Subjects and staff were blind to order; a video rater was additionally blind to stimulation and to the order of visits and blocks. Rhythmic MNS at 10 Hz improved tics. Both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz MNS improved tic frequency, intensity, and urges, but the two treatments did not differ significantly. Participant masking was effective, and there was no carryover effect. Several participants described a dramatic benefit. Discomfort was minimal. There was no evidence that the MNS benefit persisted after stimulation ended. These results replicate the tic benefit from MNS but show that the EEG entrainment hypothesis cannot explain that benefit. Another electrophysiological mechanism may explain the benefit; alternatively, these data do not exclude a placebo effect.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available