4.7 Article

Comparison of Intranasal Steroid Application Using Nasal Spray and Spray-Sol to Treat Allergic Rhinitis: A Preliminary Investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103492

Keywords

nasal device; Spray-sol; nasal spray; beclomethasone dipropionate; allergic rhinitis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP) delivered via Spray-sol with nasal spray in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients. The results showed that BDP delivered with Spray-sol was more effective in reducing nasal symptoms and inflammation compared to nasal spray. These findings suggest the potential application of BDP nasal solution in the treatment of AR.
Allergic Rhinitis (AR) is a chronic inflammatory disease of sino-nasal mucosa, is IgE-mediated, and affects 10-40% of the global population. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nasal administration of Beclomethasone Dipropionate (BDP) delivered via Spray-sol with nasal spray in patients suffering from AR. We included 28 AR patients assigned to one of the two following treatments: the Spray-sol group (BDP via Spray-sol) (n = 13) and the spray group (BDP using a common nasal spray) (n = 15). Both treatments were administered twice daily for 4 weeks. A nasal endoscopy evaluation and Total Nasal Symptom Score were performed at baseline and after treatment. The Spray-sol group showed better results than the spray group regarding nasal endoscopy (edema, p < 0.01; irritation, p < 0.01; secretion, p < 0.01) and nasal symptoms (nasal congestion, p < 0.05; rhinorrhea, p < 0.05; sneezing, p < 0.05; and total score, p < 0.05). No side effects were recorded. These data supported the fact that the use of BDP delivered with Spray-sol is more effective than BDP nasal spray in AR patients. Further studies are needed to confirm these encouraging results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available