4.7 Review

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in HCM Phenocopies: From Diagnosis to Risk Stratification and Therapeutic Management

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103481

Keywords

hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; cardiac magnetic resonance; phenocopies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart disease characterized by thickening of the heart muscle. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has emerged as a powerful tool for the assessment of HCM and its phenocopies. CMR can accurately quantify hypertrophy, assess fibrosis, and differentiate HCM from other diseases with similar features.
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic heart disease characterized by the thickening of the heart muscle, which can lead to symptoms such as chest pain, shortness of breath, and an increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, not all patients with HCM have the same underlying genetic mutations, and some have conditions that resemble HCM but have different genetic or pathophysiological mechanisms, referred to as phenocopies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has emerged as a powerful tool for the non-invasive assessment of HCM and its phenocopies. CMR can accurately quantify the extent and distribution of hypertrophy, assess the presence and severity of myocardial fibrosis, and detect associated abnormalities. In the context of phenocopies, CMR can aid in the differentiation between HCM and other diseases that present with HCM-like features, such as cardiac amyloidosis (CA), Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD), and mitochondrial cardiomyopathies. CMR can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information that can guide clinical decision-making and management strategies. This review aims to describe the available evidence of the role of CMR in the assessment of hypertrophic phenotype and its diagnostic and prognostic implications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available