Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages -Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12124134
Keywords
myomectomy; da Vinci; robotic gynaecologic surgery; uterine fibroids; minimally invasive surgery
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM), conventional laparoscopic myomectomy (CLM), and abdominal myomectomy (AM) for uterine fibroid treatment. RALM was found to be superior to AM in all assessed parameters except operation duration. RALM performed similarly to CLM in most parameters; however, it had reduced intraoperative bleeding and lower conversion rate to laparotomy in patients with small fibroids, making it a safer overall approach.
Background: Uterine fibroids are the most frequently diagnosed gynaecological tumours, and they often require surgical treatment (conventional laparoscopic myomectomy-CLM). The introduction and evolution of robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy (RALM) in the early 2000s has expanded the range of minimally invasive options for the majority of cases. This study aims to compare RALM with CLM and abdominal myomectomy (AM). Methods and materials: Fifty-three eligible studies adhered to the pre-established inclusion criteria and were subsequently evaluated for risk of bias and statistical heterogeneity. Results: The available comparative studies were compared using surgical outcomes, namely blood loss, complication rate, transfusion rate, operation duration, conversion to laparotomy, and length of hospitalisation. RALM was significantly superior to AM in all assessed parameters other than operation duration. RALM and CLM performed similarly in most parameters; however, RALM was associated with reduced intra-operative bleeding in patients with small fibroids and had lower rates of conversion to laparotomy, proving RALM as a safer overall approach. Conclusion: The robotic approach for surgical treatment of uterine fibroids is a safe, effective, and viable approach, which is constantly being improved and may soon acquire widespread adoption and prove to be superior to CLM in certain patient subgroups.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available