4.7 Review

Simulators and Simulations for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An ECMO Scoping Review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12051765

Keywords

extracorporeal life support (ECLS); simulation training; model; classification; fidelity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-volume ECMO centers generally have better outcomes due to suitable exposure to ECMO cases. Simulation-based training (SBT) offers an option for education and clinical skills improvement. The classification of ECMO simulators as low-, mid-, or high-fidelity based on overall fidelity can be used to compare and enhance ECMO patient outcomes.
High-volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers generally have better outcomes than (new) low-volume ECMO centers, most likely achieved by a suitable exposure to ECMO cases. To achieve a higher level of training, simulation-based training (SBT) offers an additional option for education and extended clinical skills. SBT could also help to improve the interdisciplinary team interactions. However, the level of ECMO simulators and/or simulations (ECMO sims) techniques may vary in purpose. We present a structured and objective classification of ECMO sims based on the broad experience of users and the developer for the available ECMO sims as low-, mid-, or high-fidelity. This classification is based on overall ECMO sim fidelity, established by taking the median of the definition-based fidelity, component fidelity, and customization fidelity as determined by expert opinion. According to this new classification, only low- and mid-fidelity ECMO sims are currently available. This comparison method may be used in the future for the description of new developments in ECMO sims, making it possible for ECMO sim designers, users, and researchers to compare accordingly, and ultimately improve ECMO patient outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available