4.7 Review

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12072601

Keywords

stroke; neuromodulation; transcranial direct current stimulation; magnetic resonance imaging

Ask authors/readers for more resources

During rehabilitation, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) can be used to prime the motor system of stroke patients and potentially enhance therapy outcomes. However, the efficacy of tDCS varies among patients, which may be influenced by factors such as cortical infarct regions, motor tract injury, and connectivity changes. Neuroimaging techniques are needed to quantify these factors and understand the impact on tDCS delivery. This review summarizes the development of tDCS for stroke from a neuroimaging perspective and discusses potential strategies for personalized tDCS based on anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics.
During rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to which patients show improvements following tDCS is highly variable. This variability may be due to heterogeneity in regions of cortical infarct, descending motor tract injury, and/or connectivity changes, all factors that require neuroimaging for precise quantification and that affect the actual amount and location of current delivery. If the relationship between these factors and tDCS efficacy were clarified, recovery from stroke using tDCS might be become more predictable. This review provides a comprehensive summary and timeline of the development of tDCS for stroke from the viewpoint of neuroimaging. Both animal and human studies that have explored detailed aspects of anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics relevant to tDCS are discussed. Selected computational works are also included to demonstrate how sophisticated strategies for reducing variable effects of tDCS, including electric field modeling, are moving the field ever closer towards the goal of personalizing tDCS for each individual. Finally, larger and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials involving tDCS for chronic stroke recovery are underway that likely will shed light on how specific tDCS parameters, such as dose, affect stroke outcomes. The success of these collective efforts will determine whether tDCS for chronic stroke gains regulatory approval and becomes clinical practice in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available