4.7 Article

Vision-Related Parameters Affecting Stereopsis after Retinal Detachment Surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041527

Keywords

aniseikonia; contrast sensitivity; metamorphopsia; retinal detachment; stereopsis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Even after successful surgery, retinal detachment (RD) patients still have inferior stereopsis compared to normal subjects. It is unclear which visual dysfunction in the affected eye is responsible for the postoperative stereopsis impairment.
Even after successful surgery, the stereopsis of retinal detachment (RD) patients is inferior to that of normal subjects. However, it is unclear which visual dysfunction in the affected eye is responsible for the postoperative stereopsis impairment. This study included 127 patients after successful surgery for unilateral RD. Stereopsis, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), severity of metamorphopsia, letter contrast sensitivity and amount of aniseikonia were examined at 6-month postoperatively. Stereopsis was assessed using the Titmus Stereo Test (TST) and TNO stereotest (TNO). Postoperative stereopsis (log) in patients with RD were 2.09 +/- 0.46 in the TST and 2.56 +/- 0.62 in the TNO. Multivariate analysis with stepwise regression revealed postoperative TST was associated with BCVA, and TNO was associated with BCVA, letter contrast sensitivity, metamorphopsia and absolute values of aniseikonia. In a subgroup analysis that selected those with more impaired stereopsis, postoperative TST was associated with BCVA (p < 0.001), and TNO was associated with letter contrast sensitivity (p < 0.005) and absolute values of aniseikonia (p < 0.05) by multivariate analysis. Deterioration of stereopsis after RD surgery was affected by a variety of visual dysfunctions. The TST was affected by visual acuity, while the TNO was affected by contrast sensitivity and aniseikonia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available