4.7 Review

The Effect of Metabolic Syndrome and Its Individual Components on Renal Function: A Meta-Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041614

Keywords

chronic kidney disease; renal function; metabolic syndrome; meta-analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This meta-analysis examined the relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and renal dysfunction. The results showed that MetS and its components were associated with an increased risk of renal dysfunction, including rapid decline in eGFR, new-onset CKD, and ESRD. Elevated blood pressure had the highest risk, while impaired fasting glucose had the lowest risk.
Background: Observational studies have reported inconsistent findings in the relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS), its components, and loss of renal function, mainly including eGFR decline, new-onset CKD, and ESRD. This meta-analysis was performed to investigate their potential associations. Methods: PubMed and EMBASE were systematically searched from their inception to 21 July 2022. Observational cohort studies in English assessing the risk of renal dysfunction in individuals with MetS were identified. Risk estimates and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted and pooled using the random-effects approach. Results: A total of 32 studies with 413,621 participants were included in the meta-analysis. MetS contributed to higher risks of renal dysfunction (RR = 1.50, 95% CI = 1.39-1.61) and, specifically, rapid decline in eGFR (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51), new-onset CKD (RR 1.47, 95% CI 1.37-1.58), as well as ESRD (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.08-2.22). Moreover, all individual components of MetS were significantly associated with renal dysfunction, while elevated BP conveyed the highest risk (RR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.29-1.46), impaired fasting glucose with the lowest and diabetic-dependent risk (RR = 1.20, 95% CI = 1.09-1.33). Conclusions: Individuals with MetS and its components are at higher risk of renal dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available