4.5 Article

Surgical salvage of recurrent vestibular schwannoma following prior stereotactic radiosurgery

Journal

LARYNGOSCOPE
Volume 126, Issue 11, Pages 2580-2586

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25943

Keywords

Vestibular schwannoma; acoustic neuroma; recurrence; radiosurgery; gamma knife; microsurgery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives/HypothesisTo evaluate outcomes of salvage surgery for vestibular schwannoma (VS) that failed primary stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MethodsCase-control study of 37 patients who underwent surgical resection of sporadic VS following prior SRS at two tertiary academic referral centers between 2003 and 2015. A cohort of nonirradiated control subjects, matched according to tumor size, age, and treatment center, were used as comparison. ResultsThirty-seven patients were included. The median time from radiation to surgical salvage was 36 months (range 9.6-153 months). Following tumor progression after SRS, 18 (49%) patients underwent gross total resection, 10 (27%) underwent near-total resection, and nine (24%) underwent subtotal resection. Postoperative complications following salvage surgery included one (3%) case of stroke, four (11%) cases of cerebrospinal fluid leak, and two (5%) cases of meningitis. Twenty-seven (73%) patients had good postoperative facial nerve outcome (House-Brackmann Score I-II) at long-term follow-up. There were no cases of tumor recurrence or regrowth after a median length of 26 months following microsurgical salvage (range 3-114 months). The rate of satisfactory postoperative facial nerve function was not different between study and control subjects (73% vs. 76%; P = 0.8); however, less-than-complete resection was utilized more frequently among previously radiated patients (P = 0.01). ConclusionMicrosurgical salvage of VS following primary radiation therapy is challenging. Less-than-complete resection is required in a greater percentage of patients to preserve facial nerve integrity and prevent neurological complications. Long-term follow-up is needed to determine the risk of delayed progression following incomplete tumor removal. Level of Evidence3b. Laryngoscope, 126:2580-2586, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available