4.7 Article

The Prognostic and Diagnostic Value of [18F]FDG PET/CT in Untreated Laryngeal Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103514

Keywords

PET/CT; semiquantitative PET parameters; laryngeal squamous-cell carcinoma; metastatic lymph node; [F-18]FDG PET/CT vs. neck MRI; MTV; TLG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and neck MRI in patients with laryngeal carcinoma and investigate the predictive value of PET/CT for survival outcomes. The results showed that PET/CT had higher sensitivity and accuracy for nodal metastasis than MRI. Additionally, PET parameters were significant prognostic factors for overall survival and progression-free survival. The study concluded that PET/CT improves nodal staging accuracy and provides valuable information for survival prognostication in laryngeal carcinoma.
This study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of staging PET/CT and neck MRI in patients with laryngeal carcinoma and to assess the value of PET/CT in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Sixty-eight patients who had both modalities performed before treatment between 2014 and 2021 were included in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT and MRI were evaluated. PET/CT had 93.8% sensitivity, 58.3% specificity, and 75% accuracy for nodal metastasis, whereas MRI had 68.8%, 61.1%, and 64.7% accuracy, respectively. At a median follow-up of 51 months, 23 patients had developed disease progression and 17 patients had died. Univariate-survival analysis revealed all utilized PET parameters as significant prognostic factors for OS and PFS (p-value < 0.03 each). In multivariate analysis, metabolic-tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) predicted better PFS (p-value < 0.05 each). In conclusion, PET/CT improves the accuracy of nodal staging in laryngeal carcinoma over neck MRI and adds to the prognostication of survival outcomes through the use of several PET metrics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available