4.7 Article

Influence of Crown-Implant Ratio and Implant Inclination on Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Region: A Retrospective Clinical Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE
Volume 12, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093219

Keywords

dental implants; single crown; crown-implant ratio; marginal bone loss; retrospective clinical study

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of crown-implant ratio (CIR) and implant inclination on marginal bone loss (MBL) in dental implants supporting single crowns. The results showed that implant inclination and anatomical and clinical CIR were not significantly related to MBL over time, while age, tooth region, and bruxism had a significant influence on MBL.
The aim of this present record-based retrospective study was to investigate the influence of the crown-implant ratio (CIR) and implant inclination in relation to the occlusal plane on the marginal bone loss (MBL) around dental implants supporting single crowns in the posterior region of the jaws. All the cases of implant-supported single crowns in the premolar and molar regions were initially considered for inclusion. Only implants not lost, with baseline radiographs taken within 12 months after implant placement and with a minimum of 36 months of radiological follow-up, were considered for the analysis of MBL. Univariate linear regression models were used to compare MBL over time between 12 clinical covariates, after which a linear mixed-effects model was built. After the exclusion of 49 cases, a total of 316 implant-supported single crowns in 234 patients were included. The results from the statistical models suggested that implant inclination and anatomical- and clinical CIR (the main related factors investigated in the study) were not statistically significantly related to MBL over time. Age (older people), tooth region (premolar), and bruxism (bruxers) had a statistically significant influence on MBL over time.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available