4.4 Article

Community carriage of ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae: a cross-sectional study of risk factors and comparative genomics of carriage and clinical isolates

Journal

MSPHERE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00025-23

Keywords

Escherichia coli; Klebsiella pneumoniae; extended-spectrum beta-lactamase; antimicrobial resistance; carriage; risk factors; general population; bacterial genomics

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The global prevalence of infections caused by ESBL-E is increasing, especially community-onset cases. However, there is limited knowledge about the population structure and risk factors for carriage in the community. This study provides insights into the prevalence and population structure of ESBL-E in a general adult population, identifying travel to Asia as a major risk factor for carriage. The genetic diversity of carriage isolates suggests frequent acquisition of ESBL genes, while clinical isolates are more clone dependent and associated with higher antibiotic resistance. These findings have important implications for identifying high-risk patients and preventing the spread of resistant bacteria.
The global prevalence of infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E) is increasing, and for Escherichia coli, observations indicate that this is partly driven by community-onset cases. The ESBL-E population structure in the community is scarcely described, and data on risk factors for carriage are conflicting. Here, we report the prevalence and population structure of fecal ESBL-producing E. coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae (ESBL-Ec/Kp) in a general adult population, examine risk factors, and compare carriage isolates with contemporary clinical isolates. Fecal samples obtained from 4,999 participants (54% women) >= 40 years in the seventh survey of the population-based Tromso Study, Norway (2015, 2016), were screened for ESBL-Ec/Kp. In addition, we included 118 ESBL-Ec clinical isolates from the Norwegian surveillance program in 2014. All isolates were whole-genome sequenced. Risk factors associated with carriage were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. ESBL-Ec gastrointestinal carriage prevalence was 3.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8%-3.9%, no sex difference] and 0.08% (0.02%-0.20%) for ESBL-Kp. For ESBL-Ec, travel to Asia was the only independent risk factor (adjusted odds ratio 3.46, 95% CI 2.18-5.49). E. coli ST131 was most prevalent in both collections. However, the ST131 proportion was significantly lower in carriage (24%) versus clinical isolates (58%, P < 0.001). Carriage isolates were genetically more diverse with a higher proportion of phylogroup A (26%) than clinical isolates (5%, P < 0.001), indicating that ESBL gene acquisition occurs in a variety of E. coli lineages colonizing the gut. STs commonly related to extraintestinal infections were more frequent in clinical isolates also carrying a higher prevalence of antimicrobial resistance, which could indicate clone-associated pathogenicity. IMPORTANCE ESBL-Ec and ESBL-Kp are major pathogens in the global burden of antimicrobial resistance. However, there is a gap in knowledge concerning the bacterial population structure of human ESBL-Ec/Kp carriage isolates in the community. We have examined ESBL-Ec/Kp isolates from a population-based study and compared these to contemporary clinical isolates. The large genetic diversity of carriage isolates indicates frequent ESBL gene acquisition, while those causing invasive infections are more clone dependent and associated with a higher prevalence of antibiotic resistance. The knowledge of factors associated with ESBL carriage helps to identify patients at risk to combat the spread of resistant bacteria within the healthcare system. Particularly, previous travel to Asia stands out as a major risk factor for carriage and should be considered in selecting empirical antibiotic treatment in critically ill patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available