4.1 Article

Identification of magnetic field errors in synchrotrons based on deep Lie map networks

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW ACCELERATORS AND BEAMS
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.26.064601

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetic field errors in synchrotrons can be detected and compensated using deep Lie map networks, which link charged particle dynamics with machine learning methodology. This approach enables the construction of an accelerator model that includes multipole components for magnetic field errors, allowing for more precise control over the accelerator's operation.
Magnetic field errors pose a limitation in the performance of synchrotrons, as they excite nonsystematic resonances, reduce dynamic aperture, and may result in beam loss. Their effect can be compensated by assuming knowledge of their location and strength. Established identification procedures are based on orbit response matrices or resonance driving terms. While they sequentially build a field error model for subsequent accelerator sections, a method detecting field errors in parallel could save valuable beam time. We introduce deep Lie map networks, which enable the construction of an accelerator model including multipole components for the magnetic field errors by linking charged particle dynamics with machine learning methodology in a data-driven approach. Based on simulated beam position monitor readings for the example case of SIS18 at GSI, we demonstrate inference of location and strengths of gradient and sextupole errors for all accelerator sections in parallel. The obtained refined accelerator model may support setup of corrector magnets in operation to allow more precise control over tunes, chromaticities, and resonance compensation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available