4.6 Article

Long-life lithium-ion batteries realized by low-Ni, Co-free cathode chemistry

Journal

NATURE ENERGY
Volume 8, Issue 7, Pages 695-702

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41560-023-01267-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing demand for electric vehicles powered by lithium-ion batteries has caused prices of strategic battery materials like cobalt and nickel to rise sharply. Although all manufacturers are looking to reduce the usage of cobalt, nickel has become another concern due to its price approaching half of cobalt. This study introduces a complex concentrated doping strategy to eliminate cobalt in a commercial cathode, resulting in a potential cost advantage, high specific energy, and significantly improved overall performance. Through X-ray techniques and electron microscopy, the researchers uncover the origins of the cathode's superior stability.
The increasing demand for lithium-ion battery-powered electric vehicles (EVs) has led to a surge in recent prices of strategic battery materials such as cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni). While all EV makers are eager to eliminate Co usage, Ni has rapidly become another 'pain point' for the industry, as its price is nearing half that of Co. The sustainability issue facing both Ni and Co puts forward a grand materials challenge, that is, to reduce Ni content and eliminate Co while maintaining high specific energy and stability. In this work, a complex concentrated doping strategy is used to eliminate Co in a commercial NMC-532 cathode. The LiNi0.5Mn0.43Ti0.02Mg0.02Nb0.01Mo0.02O2 cathode shows potential cost advantage with relatively high specific energy and significantly improved overall performance (similar to 95% capacity retained after 1,000 cycles in pouch-type cells, 2.8-4.3 V vs graphite, at 1 C, 1.5 mA cm(-2)). Combining X-ray techniques and electron microscopy, we uncover the origins of the superior stability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available