4.4 Article

GRAMM: A new method for analysis of HLA in families

Journal

HLA
Volume 102, Issue 4, Pages 477-488

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/tan.15075

Keywords

GRIMM; haplotype phasing; HLA; HLA alleles imputation; pedigree analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, haplo-identical transplantation with multiple HLA mismatches has become a viable option for stem cell transplants. The detection of haplotype sharing requires the imputation of donor and recipient, which can have errors in high-resolution typing. The proposed graph-based family imputation (GRAMM) method has shown high accuracy in phasing alleles and improving allele imputation accuracy.
Recently, haplo-identical transplantation with multiple HLA mismatches has become a viable option for stem cell transplants. Haplotype sharing detection requires the imputation of donor and recipient. We show that even in high-resolution typing when all alleles are known, there is a 15% error rate in haplotype phasing, and even more in low-resolution typings. Similarly, in related donors, the parents' haplotypes should be imputed to determine what haplotype each child inherited. We propose graph-based family imputation (GRAMM) to phase alleles in family pedigree HLA typing data, and in mother-cord blood unit pairs. We show that GRAMM has practically no phasing errors when pedigree data are available. We apply GRAMM to simulations with different typing resolutions as well as paired cord-mother typings, and show very high phasing accuracy, and improved allele imputation accuracy. We use GRAMM to detect recombination events and show that the rate of falsely detected recombination events (false-positive rate) in simulations is very low. We then apply recombination detection to typed families to estimate the recombination rate in Israeli and Australian population datasets. The estimated recombination rate has an upper bound of 10%-20% per family (1%-4% per individual).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available