4.6 Article

Machine Learning Enables Prediction of Halide Perovskites' Optical Behavior with >90% Accuracy

Journal

ACS ENERGY LETTERS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 1716-1722

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02555

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composition-dependent degradation of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites (HOIPs) due to environmental stressors still hinders their commercialization. Machine learning models using high-throughput, in situ photoluminescence (PL) are implemented to predict the response of Cs(y)FA(1-y)Pb(Br(x)I(1-)x)(3) under relative humidity cycles. Accurate time-series forecasts with an accuracy of >90% are achieved, showing potential for data-centric approaches in accelerating material development for clean-energy devices.
The composition-dependent degradation of hybrid organicinorganic perovskites (HOIPs) due to environmental stressors still precludes their commercialization. It is very difficult to quantify their behavior upon exposure to each stressor by exclusively using trial-and-error methods due to the high-dimensional parameter space involved. We implement machine learning (ML) models using high-throughput, in situ photoluminescence (PL) to predict the response of Cs(y)FA(1-y)Pb(Br(x)I(1-)x)(3) while exposed to relative humidity cycles. We quantitatively compare three ML models while generating forecasts of environment-dependent PL responses: linear regression, echo state network, and seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average with exogenous regressor algorithms. We achieve accuracy of >90% for the latter, while tracking PL changes over a 50 h window. Samples with 17% of Cs content consistently showed a PL increase as a function of cycle. Our precise time-series forecasts can be extended to other HOIP families, illustrating the potential of data-centric approaches to accelerate material development for clean-energy devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available