4.6 Article

Surface Modification of Carbon Nanotubes in Silicone-Polyurethane for Improved Mechanical and Anticorrosion Properties

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13030634

Keywords

carbon nanotube; silicone-polyurethane; coating; anticorrosion; mechanical property

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to enhance the mechanical and anticorrosion ability of carbon nanotubes (CNT), CNT were dispersed into homemade silicone-polyurethane (SPU) resin, but before mixing with SPU, CNT were modified using four different approaches. The modified CNT with SiO2-TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited the best mechanical properties and chemical resistance, with a significantly lower corrosion current density compared to unmodified CNT. This may be attributed to the increased roughness of the CNT surface caused by the covered SiO2-TiO2 nanoparticles, which improves their dispersion in SPU resin.
Carbon nanotubes (CNT) were dispersed into homemade silicone-polyurethane (SPU) resin in order to enhance their mechanical and anticorrosion ability. Before mixing with SPU, CNT were modified by four different approaches to improve their dispersion in SPU, and the surface of CNT were covered by SiO2-TiO2 nanoparticles, -NH2 groups, epoxy groups or isocyanate groups, respectively. The structures of the modified CNTs were checked by XRD, FTIR, and SEM. After being dispersed in SPU to form a composite coating, the one with SiO2-TiO2 nanoparticles modified CNT exhibited the best mechanical properties and chemical resistance (low water absorption), and its corrosion current density (i(corr)) was only 9.246 x 10(-9) A cm(2), which is four orders of magnitude lower than the i(corr) value of the coating with unmodified CNT (1.599 x 10(-5) A/cm(2)). This may be because the covered SiO2-TiO2 nanoparticle increased the roughness of the CNT surface, which can improve their dispersion in SPU resin.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available