4.6 Article

Physico-Mechanical Properties of a Newly Developed Base Material Containing Mineral Trioxide Aggregate

Journal

COATINGS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/coatings13030597

Keywords

dental base material; depth of cure; compressive strength; microshear bond strength; mineral trioxide aggregate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to evaluate the physico-mechanical properties of a new cavity base material containing mineral trioxide aggregate, LA-T1, for indirect restoration. LA-T1 showed similar depth of cure and microshear bond strength as Cavios (CAV) but lower compressive strength than Bulk Base Hard (BBH). The results suggest that LA-T1 can be clinically applied as its properties are comparable to CAV.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the physico-mechanical properties of a new cavity base material containing mineral trioxide aggregate, LA-T1, prototyped by Neo Dental Chemical Products for indirect restoration. Three base materials, LA-T1, Cavios (CAV, Neo Dental Chemical Products), and Bulk Base Hard (BBH, Sun Medical), were examined. The depth of cure, microshear bond strength with a resin-based luting cement, and the compressive strength of these materials were investigated. The depth of cure of LA-T1 was similar to that of CAV, while the depth of cure of BBH was above the measurement limit. The distance from the base material to the light source, 0 mm and 4 mm, did not significantly affect the depth of cure of all materials. The microshear bond strength of LA-T1 bonded to a resin-based luting cement was slightly higher than that of CAV and similar to that of BBH, both of which were bonded to the same luting cement under the same conditions. The compressive strength of LA-T1 was similar to that of CAV but less than that of BBH. The results of this study indicate that LA-T1 has properties that are similar to those of CAV and thus can be clinically applied.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available