4.7 Article

The effect of non-metallic inclusion morphology on the hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) resistance of L80 steel

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.03.008

Keywords

L80 steel; Hydrogen embrittlement; Non-metallic inclusions; Inclusion morphology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The HIC resistance of different L80 casing steels was determined using NACE TM0284 HIC test. Microstructural and inclusion characterization was conducted using OM, SEM, and EDS. Models correlating inclusion morphology with CLR and CTR were developed, showing the complex relationship between oxide-based inclusions and MnS stringers and their impact on HIC resistance.
The hydrogen induced cracking (HIC) resistance of four (4) L80 casing steels, with different nominal compositions and processing conditions, was determined using the NACE TM0284 HIC test. Microstructural and inclusion characterization of each steel was undertaken using optical microscopy (OM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS). The morphology (equivalent diameter, aspect ratio and major length) of inclusions over identical analysis regions were measured for each steel. In total, >15,000 inclusions were characterized. Non-linear models correlating inclusion morphology with the measured values of CLR (crack length ratio) and CTR (crack thickness ratio) were developed. The models show that both CLR and CTR are complex functions of the diameter (equivalent) of oxide-based inclusions and the major length of the manganese sulfide (MnS) stringers. The models show that oxides <10 mm in diameter were found to have negligible effect on HIC resistance (CLR) while oxides >20 mm exhibited a significant and escalating negative impact on HIC resistance comparable to long (>50 mm) MnS stringers.(c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available