4.5 Article

The Effects of the Upper Atmosphere and Corona on the Solar Wind Interaction With Venus

Journal

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022JA031239

Keywords

Venus upper atmosphere; solar wind interaction; MHD model; oxygen corona

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since Venus lacks a substantial planetary magnetic field, the solar wind plasma directly interacts with its ionosphere, upper atmosphere, and corona. The role of the thermal atmosphere and hot oxygen corona in this interaction process is examined using three-dimensional numerical models. The results show that the hot oxygen corona can enhance ion loss rates by up to 25% during high solar activity.
Since Venus has no substantial planetary magnetic field, the fast-flowing solar wind plasma interacts directly with its ionosphere, upper atmosphere, and corona. The thermal atmosphere and hot oxygen corona of Venus are expected to play essential roles in the interaction process. To quantify their effects, we combine three major state-of-the-art three-dimensional numerical models, including (a) The Venus thermosphere general circulation model (VTGCM), (b) The adaptive mesh particle simulator (AMPS), and (c) A multi-species Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) model of Venus based on Block Adaptive Tree Solar-wind Roe Upwind Scheme. The global multi-species MHD model is used to simulate the planet's interaction with the ambient solar wind, where the background neutral densities are provided by VTGCM and AMPS. Using the above-mentioned numerical models, the effect of the upper atmosphere and corona on solar wind driven ion escape rates are examined for three typical solar cycle conditions, including solar maximum, solar median, and solar minimum conditions. The model results suggest that even though the hot oxygen corona only has a minor effect on the ion density profiles in the ionosphere, it can enhance ion loss rate up to similar to 25% for high solar activity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available