4.6 Article

Distress tolerance and emotional regulation in individuals with alcohol use disorder

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1175664

Keywords

distress tolerance; emotional dysregulation; alexithymia; depressive symptoms; alcohol use disorder

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous research suggests that low distress tolerance may be associated with poor emotion regulation and alcohol-related problems. However, little is known about distress tolerance in individuals with AUD and its association with emotional dysregulation. This study found a significant link between emotional dysregulation and distress tolerance, even when controlling for other factors.
BackgroundPrevious research suggests that low distress tolerance may be associated with poor emotion regulation, contribute to drinking to cope motives, and predict alcohol-related problems in non-clinical populations. However, little is known about the ability to tolerate distress among individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and its association with emotional dysregulation. The aim of this study was to examine the link between emotional dysregulation and a behavioral measure of distress tolerance among individuals with AUD. MethodsThe sample consisted of 227 individuals with AUD enrolled in an 8-week abstinence-based inpatient treatment program. Behavioral distress tolerance was assessed using a test of ischemic pain tolerance and the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) was used to assess emotion dysregulation. ResultsDistress tolerance was significantly associated with emotional dysregulation even when accounting for alexithymia, depressive symptomatology, age, and biological sex. ConclusionThe current study provides preliminary support for an association between low distress tolerance and emotion dysregulation in a clinical group of patients with AUD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available