4.7 Article

Multigenerational mistimed feeding drives circadian reprogramming with an impaired unfolded protein response

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1157165

Keywords

mistimed feeding; multigenerational effect; rhythm reprogramming; unfolded protein response; ER stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mistimed food intake disrupts circadian rhythms in peripheral tissues and increases the risk of metabolic diseases. This study establishes a 10-generation mouse model to investigate the effects of continuous daytime-restricted feeding (DRF). The results show that mistimed food intake leads to cumulative effects on ER stress sensitivity over generations in mice.
Mistimed food intake in relation to the day/night cycle disrupts the synchrony of circadian rhythms in peripheral tissues and increases the risk of metabolic diseases. However, the health effects over generations have seldom been explored. Here, we established a 10-generation mouse model that was continuously fed with daytime-restricted feeding (DRF). We performed RNA-seq analysis of mouse liver samples obtained every 4 h over a 24 h period from F2, F5 and F10 generations exposed to DRF. Multigenerational DRF programs the diurnal rhythmic transcriptome through a gain or loss of diurnal rhythmicity over generations. Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the differential rhythmic transcriptome revealed that adaptation to persistent DRF is accompanied by impaired endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Consistently, a substantially higher level of folding-deficient proinsulin was observed in F10 liver tissues than in F2 and F5 liver tissues following tail vein injection. Subsequently, tunicamycin induced more hepatocyte death in F10 samples than in F2 and F5 samples. These data demonstrate that mistimed food intake could produce cumulative effects over generations on ER stress sensitivity in mice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available