4.6 Article

Transcriptome profiling of flax plants exposed to a low-frequency alternating electromagnetic field

Journal

FRONTIERS IN GENETICS
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1205469

Keywords

electromagnetic field; flax; antioxidants; stress; transcriptome; RNA-seq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

All living organisms are adapted to and utilize the electromagnetic field (EMF) of the Earth. However, the development of electricity and electronics in the last century introduced new EMF sources. Previous research suggested that EMF affects cellular homeostasis and gene expression in plants. This study aims to identify the genes involved in the plant response to EMF and understand the mechanisms behind it.
All living organisms on Earth evolved in the presence of an electromagnetic field (EMF), adapted to the environment of EMF, and even learned to utilize it for their purposes. However, during the last century, the Earth's core lost its exclusivity, and many EMF sources appeared due to the development of electricity and electronics. Previous research suggested that the EMF led to changes in intercellular free radical homeostasis and further altered the expression of genes involved in plant response to environmental stresses, inorganic ion transport, and cell wall constituent biosynthesis. Later, CTCT sequence motifs in gene promoters were proposed to be responsible for the response to EMF. How these motifs or different mechanisms are involved in the plant reaction to external EMF remains unknown. Moreover, as many genes activated under EMF treatment do not have the CTCT repeats in their promoters, we aimed to determine the transcription profile of a plant exposed to an EMF and identify the genes that are directly involved in response to the treatment to find the common denominator of the observed changes in the plant transcriptome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available