4.6 Article

Corneal nerve loss predicts dementia in patients with mild cognitive impairment

Journal

ANNALS OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL NEUROLOGY
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages 599-609

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51747

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the utility of corneal nerve measures and brain volumetry for predicting progression to dementia in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The results showed that corneal nerve measures had a higher prognostic accuracy than hippocampus and whole brain volume for identifying individuals who progressed to dementia.
Objectives: This study compared the utility of corneal nerve measures with brain volumetry for predicting progression to dementia in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).Methods: Participants with no cognitive impairment (NCI) and MCI underwent assessment of cognitive function, brain volumetry of thirteen brain structures, including the hippocampus and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Participants with MCI were followed up in the clinic to identify progression to dementia.Results: Of 107 participants with MCI aged 68.4 & PLUSMN; 7.7 years, 33 (30.8%) progressed to dementia over 2.6-years of follow-up. Compared to participants with NCI (n = 12), participants who remained with MCI (n = 74) or progressed to dementia had lower corneal nerve measures (p < 0.0001). Progressors had lower corneal nerve measures, hippocampal, and whole brain volume (all p < 0.0001). However, CCM had a higher prognostic accuracy (72%-75% vs 68%-69%) for identifying individuals who progressed to dementia compared to hippocampus and whole brain volume. The adjusted odds ratio for progression to dementia was 6.1 (95% CI: 1.6-23.8) and 4.1 (95% CI: 1.2-14.2) higher with abnormal CCM measures, but was not significant for abnormal brain volume.Interpretation: Abnormal CCM measures have a higher prognostic accuracy than brain volumetry for predicting progression from MCI to dementia. Further work is required to validate the predictive ability of CCM compared to other established biomarkers of dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available