4.7 Article Data Paper

The first high-quality chromosome-level genome of the Sipuncula Sipunculus nudus using HiFi and Hi-C data

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02235-7

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a high-quality chromosome-level assembly of Sipunculus nudus was obtained using HiFi reads and high-resolution chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data. The assembled genome was 1,427 Mb, with a contig N50 length of 29.46 Mb and scaffold N50 length of 80.87 Mb. Approximately 98% of the genome sequence was anchored to 17 chromosomes. The presence of 97.7% of the expectedly conserved genes in the genome assembly was confirmed by BUSCO assessment. This genome will serve as an important reference for studying the genetic diversity and evolution of Lophotrochozoa.
Sipuncula is a class of exocoelomic unsegmented animals whose evolutionary relationships are unresolved. The peanut worm Sipunculus nudus is a globally distributed, economically important species belonging to the class Sipuncula. Herein, we present the first high-quality chromosome-level assembly of S. nudus based on HiFi reads and high-resolution chromosome conformation capture (Hi-C) data. The assembled genome was 1,427 Mb, with a contig N50 length of 29.46 Mb and scaffold N50 length of 80.87 Mb. Approximately 97.91% of the genome sequence was anchored to 17 chromosomes. A BUSCO assessment showed that 97.7% of the expectedly conserved genes were present in the genome assembly. The genome was composed of 47.91% repetitive sequences, and 28,749 protein-coding genes were predicted. A phylogenetic tree demonstrated that Sipuncula belongs to Annelida and diverged from the common ancestor of Polychaeta. The high-quality chromosome-level genome of S. nudus will serve as a valuable reference for studies of the genetic diversity and evolution of Lophotrochozoa.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available