4.7 Article Data Paper

Eighteen years of upland grassland carbon flux data: reference datasets, processing, and gap-filling procedure

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02221-z

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Plant-atmosphere exchange fluxes of CO2 measured with the Eddy covariance method are important for assessing ecosystem carbon budgets. This study presents eddy flux measurements for a managed upland grassland in France over a 20-year period. Pre-processing and post-processing approaches were used to overcome data gaps in the long-term datasets. The resulting datasets can be used for studying the impact of climate change on grassland ecosystems and for model evaluation and validation in carbon-cycle research.
Plant-atmosphere exchange fluxes of CO2 measured with the Eddy covariance method are used extensively for the assessment of ecosystem carbon budgets worldwide. The present paper describes eddy flux measurements for a managed upland grassland in Central France studied over two decades (2003-2021). We present the site meteorological data for this measurement period, and we describe the pre-processing and post-processing approaches used to overcome issues of data gaps, commonly associated with long-term EC datasets. Recent progress in eddy flux technology and machine learning now paves the way to produce robust long-term datasets, based on normalised data processing techniques, but such reference datasets remain rare for grasslands. Here, we combined two gap-filling techniques, Marginal Distribution Sampling (short gaps) and Random Forest (long gaps), to complete two reference flux datasets at the half-hour and daily-scales respectively. The resulting datasets are valuable for assessing the response of grassland ecosystems to (past) climate change, but also for model evaluation and validation with respect to future global change research with the carbon-cycle community.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available