Trait biases in microbial reference genomes

Common culturing techniques and priorities bias our discovery towards specific traits that may not be representative of microbial diversity in nature. So far, these biases have not been systematically examined. To address this gap, here we use 116,884 publicly available metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs, completeness >= 80%) from 203 surveys worldwide as a culture-independent sample of bacterial and archaeal diversity, and compare these MAGs to the popular RefSeq genome database, which heavily relies on cultures. We compare the distribution of 12,454 KEGG gene orthologs (used as trait proxies) in the MAGs and RefSeq genomes, while controlling for environment type (ocean, soil, lake, bioreactor, human, and other animals). Using statistical modeling, we then determine the conditional probabilities that a species is represented in RefSeq depending on its genetic repertoire. We find that the majority of examined genes are significantly biased for or against in RefSeq. Our systematic estimates of gene prevalences across bacteria and archaea in nature and gene-specific biases in reference genomes constitutes a resource for addressing these issues in the future.

Automated summary

Common culturing techniques bias the discovery of microbial diversity. This study compares culture-independent metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to the RefSeq genome database to examine these biases. The distribution of gene orthologs in MAGs and RefSeq genomes is compared, revealing significant biases. This systematic analysis provides a resource for addressing these biases in the future.