4.7 Article Data Paper

A Large-scale Synthetic Pathological Dataset for Deep Learning-enabled Segmentation of Breast Cancer

Journal

SCIENTIFIC DATA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02125-y

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To enhance computational pathology, we introduce a large-scale synthetic pathological image dataset paired with nucleus annotations, called SNOW. By applying off-the-shelf image generator and nuclei annotator, SNOW offers a cost-effective means to improve model performance. Results show that models trained on synthetic data are competitive and expand the use of synthetic images for data-driven clinical tasks.
The success of training computer-vision models heavily relies on the support of large-scale, real-world images with annotations. Yet such an annotation-ready dataset is difficult to curate in pathology due to the privacy protection and excessive annotation burden. To aid in computational pathology, synthetic data generation, curation, and annotation present a cost-effective means to quickly enable data diversity that is required to boost model performance at different stages. In this study, we introduce a large-scale synthetic pathological image dataset paired with the annotation for nuclei semantic segmentation, termed as Synthetic Nuclei and annOtation Wizard (SNOW). The proposed SNOW is developed via a standardized workflow by applying the off-the-shelf image generator and nuclei annotator. The dataset contains overall 20k image tiles and 1,448,522 annotated nuclei with the CC-BY license. We show that SNOW can be used in both supervised and semi-supervised training scenarios. Extensive results suggest that synthetic-data-trained models are competitive under a variety of model training settings, expanding the scope of better using synthetic images for enhancing downstream data-driven clinical tasks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available