4.6 Article

Outcome of patients with carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections treated with cefiderocol: A multicenter observational study

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFECTION AND PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages 1485-1491

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE LONDON
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2023.06.009

Keywords

Cefiderocol; A. baumannii; Carbapenem-resistant; Mortality; Clinical failure; Microbiological failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter study, the effectiveness of cefiderocol in carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections was demonstrated, and it was found to be effective as monotherapy. However, larger prospective multicenter studies with a control group using standard of care are needed to determine the optimal treatment for CRAB infections.
Background: No clear evidence supports the use of cefiderocol as first line treatment in A. baumannii infections. Methods: We conducted an observational retrospective/prospective multicenter study including all patients > 18 years with carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) infections treated with cefiderocol, from June 12021 to October 30 2022. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality, secondary end-points the clinical and microbiological response at 7 days and at the end of treatment. Furthermore, we compared the clinical and microbiological outcomes among patients who received cefiderocol in monotherapy or in combination. Results: Thirty-eight patients with forty episodes of infection were included [mean age 65 years (SD +/- 16.3), 75% males, 90% with hospital-acquired infections and 70% showing sepsis or septic shock]. The most common infections included unknown source or catheter-related bacteremia (45%) and pneumonia (40%). We observed at 7 days and at the end of therapy a rate of microbiological failure of 20% and 10%, respectively, and of clinical failure of 47.5% and 32.5%, respectively; the 30-day mortality rate was 47.5%. At multivariate analysis clinical failure at 7 days of treatment was the only independent predictor of 30-day mortality. Comparing monotherapy (used in 72.5%) vs. combination therapy (used in 27.5%), no differences were observed in mortality (51.7 vs 45.5%) and clinical (41.4 vs 63.7%) or microbiological failure (24.1 vs 9.1%). Conclusions: The findings of this study reinforce the effectiveness of cefiderocol in CRAB infections, also as monotherapy. However, prospective multicenter studies with larger sample sizes and a control group treated with standard of care are needed to identify the best treatment for CRAB infections. (c) 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available