4.6 Article

Structure and Dynamics of a Model Polymer Mixture Mimicking a Levan-Based Bacterial Biofilm of Bacillus subtilis

Journal

LANGMUIR
Volume 32, Issue 32, Pages 8182-8194

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b02041

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0201, P4-0116, N1-0042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we report on the structure and dynamics of biologically important model polymer mixtures that mimic the extracellular polymeric matrix in native biofilm of Bacillus subtilis. This biofilm is rich in nonionic polysaccharide levan, but also contains other biopolymers such as DNA and proteins in small concentrations. Aiming to identify the contribution of each component to the formation of the biofilm, our investigations encompassed dynamic rheology, small-angle X-ray scattering, dynamic light scattering, microscopy, densitometry, and sound velocity measurements. As it turned out, this very powerful combination of techniques is able to provide solid results on the dynamical and structural aspects of the microbiologically and chemically complex biofilm formations. Macroscopic rheological measurements revealed that the addition of DNA to levan solution increased the viscosity, pseudoplasticity, and elasticity of the system. The addition of protein contributed similarly, but also increased the rigidity of the system. This confirms that the presence of minor biofilm components is essential for biofilm formation. DNA and proteins appear to confine levan molecules within their supramolecular structure and, in this way, restrict the role of levan to merely a filling agent. These findings were complemented by small-angle X-ray scattering data, which provided insight into the structure on a molecular scale. One of the essential goals of this work was to compare the structural properties of the native biofilm and synthetic biofilm mixture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available