4.6 Article

Factors impacting quality of life in multiple system atrophy

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1111605

Keywords

multiple system atrophy; quality of life; atypical parkinsonian disorders; activities of daily living; hygiene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the correlation between the MSA-QoL and UMSARS to determine factors that impact the quality of life of patients with MSA. It found significant correlations between MSA-QoL total score and UMSARS Part I subtotal scores, suggesting that functional status is closely related to patient-reported quality of life. However, the study also highlighted that MSA-QoL life satisfaction rating did not significantly correlate with any UMSARS item, indicating potential limitations of the assessment. Further analysis using larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed, as well as potential modifications to the UMSARS. Overall, the study received a rating of 8 out of 10.
BackgroundMultiple system atrophy (MSA) is an atypical parkinsonian disorder marked by autonomic dysfunction, parkinsonism, cerebellar dysfunction, and poor response to dopaminergic medications such as levodopa. Patient-reported quality of life is an important benchmark for clinicians and clinical trials. The Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) allows healthcare providers to rate and assess MSA progression. The MSA-QoL questionnaire is a health-related quality of life scale intended to provide patient-reported outcome measures. In this article, we investigated inter-scale correlations between the MSA-QoL and UMSARS to determine factors impacting the quality of life of patients with MSA. MethodsTwenty patients at the Johns Hopkins Atypical Parkinsonism Center's Multidisciplinary Clinic with a diagnosis of clinically probable MSA and who filled out the MSA-QoL and UMSARS questionnaires within 2 weeks of each other were included. Inter-scale correlations between MSA-QoL and UMSARS responses were examined. Linear regressions were also performed to examine relationships between both scales. ResultsSignificant inter-scale correlations were found between the MSA-QoL and UMSARS, both between MSA-QoL total score and UMSARS Part I subtotal scores and for individual scale items. There were no significant correlations between MSA-QoL life satisfaction rating and UMSARS subtotal scores or any specific UMSARS items. Linear regression analysis found significant associations between MSA-QoL total score and UMSARS Part I and total scores, and between MSA-QoL life satisfaction rating and UMSARS Part I, Part II, and total scores (after adjustment for age). ConclusionsOur study demonstrates significant inter-scale correlations between MSA-QoL and UMSARS, particularly relating to activities of daily living and hygiene. MSA-QoL total score and UMSARS Part I subtotal scores, which assess patients' functional status, were significantly correlated. The lack of significant associations between MSA-QoL life satisfaction rating and any UMSARS item suggests there may be aspects to quality of life that are not fully captured by this assessment. Larger cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses utilizing UMSARS and MSA-QoL are warranted and modification of the UMSARS should be considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available