4.8 Article

Appropriate pre-transplant strategy for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes receiving allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation after myeloablative conditioning

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1146619

Keywords

myelodysplastic syndrome; pre-transplant strategy; myeloablative conditioning; haematopoietic stem cell transplantation; prognosis

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the impact of different pre-transplant therapies and transplantation interval times on the prognosis of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). The results showed that there were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) between patients who received hypomethylating agents (HMAs) or supportive care (SC), except for a lower rate of non-relapse mortality in the HMA-treated group. Compared to patients who received HMA, those who received chemotherapy-based therapy had a lower OS rate and a slightly higher non-relapse mortality rate. The early transplant group (transplant interval <6 months) had better OS and lower non-relapse mortality compared to the delayed transplant group (transplant interval >= 6 months).
PurposeAppropriate pre-transplant strategies in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) remain challenging. We sought to assess the effect of different pre-transplant therapies and transplantation interval times on patient prognosis. MethodsWe retrospectively analysed clinical data for 371 consecutive MDS patients after myeloablative transplantation between 2007 and 2019. ResultsThe median age of the patients was 38 years (range, 12-64 years). A total of 114 patients (31%) received supportive care (SC), 108 (29%) hypomethylating agents (HMAs), and 149 (40%) chemotherapy-based therapy before transplantation. In patients who received HMA or SC, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS; P=0.151) or relapse-free survival (RFS; P=0.330), except that HMA-treated patients had a lower rate of non-relapse mortality (5-year NRM: 18% vs. 32%, P=0.035). However, compared with patients who received HMA, those who received chemotherapy-based therapy had a lower 5-year OS rate (56% vs. 69%, P=0.020) and a slightly higher 5-year NRM rate (28% vs. 18%, P=0.067). Compared to the delayed transplant group (transplant interval >= 6 months), the early transplant group (transplant interval <6 months) had a superior 5-year OS (66% vs. 51%, P=0.001) and a lower 5-year cumulative incidence of NRM (22% vs. 36%, P=0.001). ConclusionThe findings of the study indicate that receiving an appropriate pre-transplant strategy (SC/HMA + <6 months) significantly improves OS and decreases NRM in MDS patients after myeloablative transplantation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available