4.8 Review

Sex-biased immunological processes drive hidradenitis suppurativa

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1167021

Keywords

hidradenitis suppurativa; sex; immune activation; Th17; hormones; X chromosome

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring. HS has a strong female sex bias, and this article reviews the role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in sex-related differences in immunity and their potential role in HS pathophysiology. Hormones, X chromosome dosage, genetics, the microbiome, and smoking are discussed as possible factors contributing to sex-related differences in immunity and HS disease presentations.
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that can manifest with abscesses, sinus tracts, and scarring in the intertriginous areas of the body. HS is characterized by immune dysregulation, featuring elevated levels of myeloid cells, T helper (Th) cells, and pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly those involved in Th1- and Th17-mediated immunity. In most epidemiological studies, HS shows a strong female sex bias, with reported female-to-male ratios estimated at roughly 3:1, suggesting that sex-related factors contribute to HS pathophysiology. In this article, we review the role of intrinsic and extrinsic factors that contribute to immunological differences between the sexes and postulate their role in the female sex bias observed in HS. We discuss the effects of hormones, X chromosome dosage, genetics, the microbiome, and smoking on sex-related differences in immunity to postulate potential immunological mechanisms in HS pathophysiology. Future studies are required to better characterize sex-biased factors that contribute to HS disease presentations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available