4.8 Review

The choice of new treatments in autoimmune hemolytic anemia: how to pick from the basket?

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1180509

Keywords

clinical trials; complement inhibitors; cold agglutinin disease; corticosteroids; immune suppression; rituximab; therapy; autoimmune hemolytic anemia

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a condition characterized by increased erythrocyte turnover caused by autoimmune mechanisms. Different treatment options exist for warm-antibody AIHA and cold agglutinin disease, targeting various pathways and mechanisms involved. However, the optimal treatment for AIHA is still uncertain and further evidence-based therapies are needed, emphasizing the importance of prospective clinical trials.
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is defined by increased erythrocyte turnover mediated by autoimmune mechanisms. While corticosteroids remain first-line therapy in most cases of warm-antibody AIHA, cold agglutinin disease is treated by targeting the underlying clonal B-cell proliferation or the classical complement activation pathway. Several new established or investigational drugs and treatment regimens have appeared during the last 1-2 decades, resulting in an improvement of therapy options but also raising challenges on how to select the best treatment in individual patients. In severe warm-antibody AIHA, there is evidence for the upfront addition of rituximab to prednisolone in the first line. Novel agents targeting B-cells, extravascular hemolysis, or removing IgG will offer further options in the acute and relapsed/refractory settings. In cold agglutinin disease, the development of complement inhibitors and B-cell targeting agents makes it possible to individualize therapy, based on the disease profile and patient characteristics. For most AIHAs, the optimal treatment remains to be found, and there is still a need for more evidence-based therapies. Therefore, prospective clinical trials should be encouraged.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available