4.7 Article

Spatial configuration matters: a test of the habitat amount hypothesis for plants in calcareous grasslands

Journal

LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 9, Pages 1891-1902

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0405-7

Keywords

Connectivity; Conservation; Fragmentation; Habitat amount; Plant diversity; Spatial configuration

Funding

  1. Norwegian Environment Agency
  2. Norwegian Research Council [208434/F40]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A recent hypothesis, the habitat amount hypothesis, predicts that the total amount of habitat in the landscape can replace habitat patch size and isolation in studies of species richness in fragmented landscapes. To test the habitat amount hypothesis by first evaluating at which spatial scale the relationship between species richness in equal-sized sample quadrats and habitat amount was the strongest, and then test the importance of spatial configuration of habitat-measured as local patch size and isolation-when habitat amount was taken into account. A quasi-experimental setup with 20 habitat patches of dry calcareous grasslands varying in patch size, patch isolation and habitat amount at the landscape scale was established in the inner Oslo fjord, Southern Norway. We recorded species richness of habitat specialists of vascular plants in equal-sized sample quadrats and analysed the relationship between species richness, habitat amount in the landscape and patch size and isolation. Although the total amount of habitat in a 3 km-radius around the local patch was positively related to species richness in the sample quadrats, local patch size had an additional positive effect, and the effect of patch size was higher when the amount of habitat within the 3 km-radius was high than when it was low. In our study system of specialist vascular plants in dry calcareous grasslands, we do not find support for the habitat amount hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available