4.6 Article

A Decision Tree for Rockburst Conditions Prediction

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13116655

Keywords

rockburst; rockburst condition; decision tree; machine learning algorithms; predictions; metrics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents an alternative approach to predict rockburst using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. The study used the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm and implemented two approaches: DT-RT and Unique-DT. A dataset containing 210 records was collected. Training and testing were performed on this dataset with 5 input variables. Other ML algorithms, such as RF, SVM, ANN, KNN, and AdaboostM1, were implemented for comparison. The evaluation metrics and relative importance were utilized to examine the characteristics of the DT methods. The Unique-DT model showed promising results with an average F1 score of 0.65, making it recommended for predicting rockburst conditions due to its ease, efficiency, and accuracy.
This paper presents an alternative approach to predict rockburst using Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. The study used the Decision Tree (DT) algorithm and implemented two approaches: (1) using DT model for each rock type (DT-RT), and (2) developing a single DT model (Unique-DT) for all rock types. A dataset containing 210 records was collected. Training and testing were performed on this dataset with 5 input variables, which are: Rock Type, Depth, Brittle Index (BI), Stress Index (SI), and Elastic Energy Index (EEI). Other ML algorithms, such as Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Gradient-Boosting (AdaboostM1), were implemented as a form of comparison to the DT models developed. The evaluation metrics and relative importance were utilized to examine some characteristics of the DT methods. The Unique-DT model showed a promising result of the two DT models, giving an average of (F1 = 0.65) in rockburst condition prediction. Although RF and AdaboostM1 (F1 = 0.66) performed slightly better, Unique-DT is recommended for predicting rockburst conditions because it is easier, more effective, and more accurate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available