4.6 Article

A Primer on CFD-DEM for Polymer-Filled Suspensions

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13042466

Keywords

OpenFOAM; LIGGGHTS; CFD-DEM; multiphase flows; suspensions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluates the use of the computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method (CFD-DEM) numerical approach to analyze the behavior of polymer-filled suspensions in a parallel-plate rheometer. The open-source CFD-DEM solver is utilized to model these suspensions under different particle volume fractions and fluid rheologies. The numerical results show good agreement with analytical expressions and experimental measurements, demonstrating a yield stress phenomenon as the particle volume fraction increases.
This work reports on an evaluation of the computational fluid dynamics-discrete element method (CFD-DEM) numerical approach to study the behavior of polymer-filled suspensions in a parallel-plate rheometer. For this purpose, an open-source CFD-DEM solver is used to model the behavior of such suspensions considering different particle volume fractions and different types of fluid rheology. We first validate the numerical approach for the single-phase flow of the continuum phase (fluid phase) by comparing the fluid's azimuthal velocity and shear stress components obtained from the open-source solver against the analytical expressions given in cylindrical coordinates. In addition, we compare the numerical torque given by the numerical procedure with analytical expressions obtained for Newtonian and power law fluids. For both cases, there is a remarkable agreement between the numerical and analytical results. Subsequently, we investigated the effects of the particle volume fraction on the rheology of the suspension. The numerical results agree well with the experimentally measured ones and show a yield stress phenomenon with the increase of the particle volume fraction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available