4.6 Article

Heat Transfer in Thermoelectric Generators for Waste Energy Recovery in Piston Engines

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13095647

Keywords

waste energy; thermoelectric generator; internal combustion engine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the design of a thermoelectric generator for exhaust gases from internal combustion engines, using experimentally validated CFD methodology. The influence of replacing the exhaust pipe, recirculation, and fins were studied. The results show that enlarging the inlet cone reduces recirculation and pressure drop, but also increases heat loss. Internal straight fins aligned with the flow increase heat transfer and reduce the effects of recirculation, resulting in a net energy production of 160.7 W. A comparison with a flat-type thermoelectric generator is also provided.
This paper investigates the design of a thermoelectric generator for exhaust gases from internal combustion engines. Experimentally validated CFD methodology was employed. Different issues are studied, such as the influence of the replacement of the exhaust pipe for the TEG, the recirculation produced, and the influence of fins. The results show that an enlarged inlet cone reduces the recirculation and the pressure drop of the TEG, but more heat is lost across the cone walls, reducing the heat available for the thermoelectric modules. Internal straight fins aligned with the flow achieved a 3% increase in heat transfer, did not significantly increase the pressure drop in this type of device, and reduced the effects on pressure of the recirculation, lowering the overall pressure drop by 10%. An energy production of 175.9 W with 16.2 W of pressure drop power losses resulted in a net energy production of 160.7 W. A comparison with a flat-type thermoelectric generator under the same hot source conditions is also provided.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available