4.6 Article

Estimation of Stride Length, Foot Clearance, and Foot Progression Angle Using UWB Sensors

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app13084801

Keywords

ultra-wideband; gait parameter; stride length; foot clearance; foot progression angle

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used ultra-wideband (UWB) sensors installed on shoes to measure distances between feet and proposed a method for estimating stride length, foot clearance, and foot progression angle. Ten healthy adults walked on a treadmill to acquire foot trajectory data. The results were compared with a motion capture system (MCS) and showed similar accuracy to a previous study using an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Thus, UWB sensors can be extensively applied to analyze mobile gait systems.
Stride length (SL), foot clearance (FC), and foot progression angle (FPA) are the key parameters for diagnosing gait disorders. This study used the distance data between two feet measured by ultra-wideband (UWB) sensors installed on shoes and proposed a method for estimating the three gait parameters. Here, a method of compensating the offset of the UWB sensor and estimating the distances between a base sensor installed on one foot during the stance phase and three UWB sensors on the other during the swing phase was applied. Foot trajectory was acquired in a gait experiment with ten healthy adults walking on a treadmill. The results were compared with those obtained using a motion capture system (MCS). The UWBs sensor displayed average errors of 45.84 mm, 7.60 mm, and 2.82 degrees for SL, FC, and FPA, respectively, compared with the MCS. A similar accuracy level was achieved in a previous study that used an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Thus, these results suggest that UWB sensors can be extensively applied to sensor systems used to analyze mobile gait systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available